Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8161 - 8170 of 82869 for case search.
Search results 8161 - 8170 of 82869 for case search.
[PDF]
Discipline-Specific Orientation Materials (General)
outline in the Guidance to States publication and include link to additional resources, case studies
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/fdcgenmaterials.pdf - 2022-10-11
outline in the Guidance to States publication and include link to additional resources, case studies
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/fdcgenmaterials.pdf - 2022-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Wayne T. Schimke
that the blood draw was an “unreasonable” search and seizure because the arresting officer had a less intrusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16224 - 2017-09-21
that the blood draw was an “unreasonable” search and seizure because the arresting officer had a less intrusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16224 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Karen M. Boedecker
to choose between abandoning his or her Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4973 - 2017-09-19
to choose between abandoning his or her Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4973 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149702 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149702 - 2017-09-21
State v. Wayne T. Schimke
concentration. On appeal, he contends that the blood draw was an “unreasonable” search and seizure because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16224 - 2005-03-31
concentration. On appeal, he contends that the blood draw was an “unreasonable” search and seizure because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16224 - 2005-03-31
State v. James C. Berlin
is to unearth all the relevant facts and to search for the truth. In the course of the hearing in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9373 - 2005-03-31
is to unearth all the relevant facts and to search for the truth. In the course of the hearing in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of an intoxicant. In a search of the vehicle, the officer discovered what he believed to be marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28648 - 2014-09-15
of an intoxicant. In a search of the vehicle, the officer discovered what he believed to be marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28648 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in another case. ¶6 The circuit court sentenced Moore to twenty-four months’ initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80630 - 2012-04-09
in another case. ¶6 The circuit court sentenced Moore to twenty-four months’ initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80630 - 2012-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
operation, but he received no response from them. However, a detective sergeant familiar with the case told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
operation, but he received no response from them. However, a detective sergeant familiar with the case told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. Following the stop, the officer searched Richardson’s vehicle and seized the THC and drug paraphernalia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28697 - 2007-04-11
. Following the stop, the officer searched Richardson’s vehicle and seized the THC and drug paraphernalia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28697 - 2007-04-11