Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8161 - 8170 of 73426 for has.

Thomas J. Woznicki v. Dennis W. Erickson
"authority" as a "state or local office, elected official, agency [or] board" who has "custody of a record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16957 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 83
of highway has not been constructed, it is not yet maintainable, and since the plaintiff's new
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33333 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] 2025XX001330 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Decision)
that, in various cases over many years’ time, this court has used the terms “redistricting,” “apportionment
/supreme/docs/25xx1330order.pdf - 2025-11-25

[PDF] 2025XX001438 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Decision)
has used the terms “redistricting,” “apportionment,” and “reapportionment” interchangeably to mean
/supreme/docs/25xx1438order.pdf - 2025-11-25

[PDF] WI App 18
that the involuntary placement of a child pursuant to an out-of-home CHIPS order can satisfy subd. 3.’s “has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236539 - 2019-06-11

Frontsheet
]nsofar as the section of highway has not been constructed, it is not yet maintainable, and since
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33333 - 2008-07-08

[PDF] WI APP 20
to realty if the lessor has the right to remove the property upon breach or termination of the lease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27920 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 5
to $3,850, and that he should pay less. We conclude that David has shown that the court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743227 - 2024-02-26

2007 WI APP 20
11.71(1)(e) is not entitled to any deference. The DOR further argues that, because it has extensive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27920 - 2007-02-27

[PDF] Frontsheet
' briefs also focused on the question of whether WMC has standing to assert its claims. Although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529529 - 2022-08-05