Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8161 - 8170 of 12879 for se.
Search results 8161 - 8170 of 12879 for se.
State v. Mark R. Petersen
, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark R. Petersen appeals pro se from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3897 - 2005-03-31
, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark R. Petersen appeals pro se from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3897 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey L. Sprewell v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Jeffery L. Sprewell, pro se. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14073 - 2005-03-31
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Jeffery L. Sprewell, pro se. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14073 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
constitutes a per se Sixth Amendment violation. For the reasons explained herein, we are no more persuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789591 - 2024-04-17
constitutes a per se Sixth Amendment violation. For the reasons explained herein, we are no more persuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789591 - 2024-04-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Elliott (collectively “Wilson”), pro se, appeal from a judgment of foreclosure on a land contract. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25
Elliott (collectively “Wilson”), pro se, appeal from a judgment of foreclosure on a land contract. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in any conversation.” Holub treats the admission of this evidence as prejudicial per se, but he cites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143144 - 2017-09-21
in any conversation.” Holub treats the admission of this evidence as prejudicial per se, but he cites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143144 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. Heuer
pro se. Comments by the prosecutor and Heuer which are set forth in the transcript of that hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7275 - 2017-09-20
pro se. Comments by the prosecutor and Heuer which are set forth in the transcript of that hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7275 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Freddie J. Nash, pro se, appeals from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion. Nash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60766 - 2011-03-07
CURIAM. Freddie J. Nash, pro se, appeals from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion. Nash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60766 - 2011-03-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Daniel Hawk, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752818 - 2024-01-18
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Daniel Hawk, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752818 - 2024-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
se motion pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18),1 raising several claims of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235352 - 2019-02-20
se motion pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18),1 raising several claims of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235352 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Petersen
., Brown and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark R. Petersen appeals pro se from a judgment convicting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3897 - 2017-09-20
., Brown and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark R. Petersen appeals pro se from a judgment convicting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3897 - 2017-09-20