Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 81631 - 81640 of 84117 for simple case search.
Search results 81631 - 81640 of 84117 for simple case search.
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
on element in case must establish that there is genuine issue of fact on that element by submitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9557 - 2005-03-31
on element in case must establish that there is genuine issue of fact on that element by submitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9557 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the underlying expenditures “in light of [Stephen’s] obligation to pay maintenance in this case” and determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133088 - 2015-01-20
of the underlying expenditures “in light of [Stephen’s] obligation to pay maintenance in this case” and determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133088 - 2015-01-20
Willie M. Williams v. Daniel R. Bertrand
is that the hearing officer assigned to review his case violated due process by refusing to allow him to call two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15807 - 2005-03-31
is that the hearing officer assigned to review his case violated due process by refusing to allow him to call two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15807 - 2005-03-31
Tony Limbach and Tracy Limbach v. John Donath
), particularly where, as here, the case is fact intensive and the trial court has not been asked to evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12834 - 2013-12-04
), particularly where, as here, the case is fact intensive and the trial court has not been asked to evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12834 - 2013-12-04
COURT OF APPEALS
not apply to the facts of this case, although our reasoning is somewhat different. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34063 - 2008-09-17
not apply to the facts of this case, although our reasoning is somewhat different. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34063 - 2008-09-17
State v. Arnold E. Lounsbury
sentence credit based upon the undisputed facts in this case. Section 973.155(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
sentence credit based upon the undisputed facts in this case. Section 973.155(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lynn G.
, the State filed a petition to terminate parental rights. The case was tried on March 17, 18 and 19, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6919 - 2005-03-31
, the State filed a petition to terminate parental rights. The case was tried on March 17, 18 and 19, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6919 - 2005-03-31
William Heinlein v. Clayton Industries
modification provision waived, in which case the date of tender is altered. At most, the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12541 - 2005-03-31
modification provision waived, in which case the date of tender is altered. At most, the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12541 - 2005-03-31
Helen Schlicht v. Bridget Mary VanDyke
and wrongly attempt to relitigate the case on appeal.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6453 - 2008-04-14
and wrongly attempt to relitigate the case on appeal.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6453 - 2008-04-14
County of Marquette v. Martin E. Jacobs
of this case. Probable Cause to Arrest. Jacobs argues that his detention by Johnston
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15308 - 2005-03-31
of this case. Probable Cause to Arrest. Jacobs argues that his detention by Johnston
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15308 - 2005-03-31