Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 81691 - 81700 of 87338 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 81691 - 81700 of 87338 for affidavit of filing.
[PDF]
State v. David A. Plotkin
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9334 - 2017-09-19
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9334 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Roehl to challenge his conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132591 - 2015-01-12
filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Roehl to challenge his conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132591 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Rockstroh, has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249880 - 2019-11-07
Rockstroh, has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249880 - 2019-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Counsel for Daniel Strohkirch has filed a no-merit report concluding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207815 - 2018-01-30
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Counsel for Daniel Strohkirch has filed a no-merit report concluding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207815 - 2018-01-30
State v. William M. Jones
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8621 - 2005-03-31
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8621 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, or until further order of the court.” On August 3, 2015, S.D. filed a notice of appeal, indicating he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160120 - 2017-09-21
, or until further order of the court.” On August 3, 2015, S.D. filed a notice of appeal, indicating he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160120 - 2017-09-21
Walter F. Tesch v. Best Motors, Inc.
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8692 - 2005-03-31
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in the amount of $178,046.27. Leon-Nava subsequently filed a postconviction motion seeking to compel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99313 - 2014-09-15
in the amount of $178,046.27. Leon-Nava subsequently filed a postconviction motion seeking to compel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99313 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dennis A. Graham v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9215 - 2017-09-19
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9215 - 2017-09-19
State v. Willie J. Dobson
, 1995 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7936 - 2005-03-31
, 1995 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7936 - 2005-03-31