Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8171 - 8180 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8171 - 8180 of 30118 for consulta de causas.
County of Calumet v. Andrew I. Turk
subject to our de novo review. Id. Here, Tenor articulated two grounds for the investigatory stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21673 - 2006-03-07
subject to our de novo review. Id. Here, Tenor articulated two grounds for the investigatory stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21673 - 2006-03-07
State v. Ardie Byrd
showing that his plea hearing was defective is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Issa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11212 - 2005-03-31
showing that his plea hearing was defective is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Issa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11212 - 2005-03-31
Theodore Blaszkowski v. Thomas Schmitt
of facts, Blaszkowski adversely possessed the disputed strip is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13960 - 2005-03-31
of facts, Blaszkowski adversely possessed the disputed strip is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13960 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
order. Whether this court has appellate jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215888 - 2018-07-18
order. Whether this court has appellate jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215888 - 2018-07-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
generally review de novo. See Greenwald Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Village of Mukwonago, 2023 WI 53, ¶13, 408
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989710 - 2025-07-30
generally review de novo. See Greenwald Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Village of Mukwonago, 2023 WI 53, ¶13, 408
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989710 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo whether those facts meet the constitutional standard. Williams, 241 Wis. 2d 631, ¶18. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40563 - 2015-09-08
de novo whether those facts meet the constitutional standard. Williams, 241 Wis. 2d 631, ¶18. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40563 - 2015-09-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105, ¶32, 255 Wis. 2d 537, 648 N.W.2d 829. However, we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237573 - 2019-03-14
. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105, ¶32, 255 Wis. 2d 537, 648 N.W.2d 829. However, we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237573 - 2019-03-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
acted according to law, which is a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196028 - 2017-09-21
acted according to law, which is a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196028 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, ¶8, 299 Wis. 2d 251, 729 N.W.2d 784. ¶8 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60825 - 2014-09-15
of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, ¶8, 299 Wis. 2d 251, 729 N.W.2d 784. ¶8 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60825 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Elizabeth Schultz v. William Kelly
to the legal standard for unjust enrichment, however, presents a question of law we review de novo. Waage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13066 - 2017-09-21
to the legal standard for unjust enrichment, however, presents a question of law we review de novo. Waage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13066 - 2017-09-21