Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8171 - 8180 of 63536 for records.
Search results 8171 - 8180 of 63536 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Victoria L. Stark
of discretion contemplates a process of reasoning based on facts that are of record or that are reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13784 - 2014-09-15
of discretion contemplates a process of reasoning based on facts that are of record or that are reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13784 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191477 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191477 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Terry II
unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence complained of.” State v. Harris, 119 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3078 - 2017-09-19
unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence complained of.” State v. Harris, 119 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3078 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
714, 605 N.W.2d 836. “The totality of the circumstances includes the plea hearing record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75793 - 2011-12-27
714, 605 N.W.2d 836. “The totality of the circumstances includes the plea hearing record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75793 - 2011-12-27
State v. David Karich
. No written motion is of record, but the record does contain a letter brief in support of an oral motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31
. No written motion is of record, but the record does contain a letter brief in support of an oral motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208823 - 2018-02-28
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208823 - 2018-02-28
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119515 - 2014-08-18
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119515 - 2014-08-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
not explicitly consider all of the Kruzycki factors. We disagree. The record shows that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28258 - 2014-09-15
not explicitly consider all of the Kruzycki factors. We disagree. The record shows that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28258 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. This court considered the report, independently reviewed the appellate records, and affirmed the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28983 - 2014-09-15
. This court considered the report, independently reviewed the appellate records, and affirmed the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28983 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response. He has not done so. Upon reviewing the entire Record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977228 - 2025-07-02
a response. He has not done so. Upon reviewing the entire Record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977228 - 2025-07-02