Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 15224 for 2013.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a small claims evidentiary hearing on May 31, 2013 and issued an oral ruling on July 30, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108180 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
II- Waterford LLC, 2013 WI App 38, ¶17, 346 Wis. 2d 612, 829 N.W.2d 538. “Under the lodestar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253243 - 2020-02-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2013-14). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143920 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 484, 844 N.W.2d 392 (2013), this court explained that the reference to WIS. STAT. § 971.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640502 - 2023-04-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2013-14). 1 ¶12 Summary judgment materials are to be viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170434 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on February 26, 2013. Olmsted and his wife were traveling from Appleton to their home in Bear Creek during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213890 - 2018-06-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, applied for on February 28, 2013, expired unexecuted on March 7. It does not appear that a subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190428 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, WIS. STAT. § 972.11(1) (2013-14) 1 provides: Except as provided in subs. (2) to (4), the rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170947 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180952 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) (2013-14), which requires the court to 1 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136507 - 2017-09-21