Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 16449 for commentating.
[PDF]
NOTICE
if we concluded that Kosobud had not yet refused when the officer made the not-“necessary” comment, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28346 - 2014-09-15
if we concluded that Kosobud had not yet refused when the officer made the not-“necessary” comment, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28346 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Victoria D. Roesing
rights by the arresting officer. The defense objected to this comment, arguing that it left the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3305 - 2017-09-19
rights by the arresting officer. The defense objected to this comment, arguing that it left the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3305 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
. No. 2005AP325-CR 5 ¶9 Not to unduly lengthen this opinion, but our recent comments on the effectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18733 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2005AP325-CR 5 ¶9 Not to unduly lengthen this opinion, but our recent comments on the effectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18733 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the appellate record, any such argument would be frivolous. The court’s comments about the short time period
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656419 - 2023-05-16
of the appellate record, any such argument would be frivolous. The court’s comments about the short time period
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656419 - 2023-05-16
[PDF]
State v. James F. Weber
the comments from the victim’s family, Weber’s clear record and background and the seriousness of the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15646 - 2017-09-21
the comments from the victim’s family, Weber’s clear record and background and the seriousness of the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. H.
that the trial court exhibited bias and prejudice by its comments about an alleged incident between his family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13216 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court exhibited bias and prejudice by its comments about an alleged incident between his family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13216 - 2017-09-21
State v. David L. Fries
or to comment upon any facts in the record that might be relevant to it. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11602 - 2005-03-31
or to comment upon any facts in the record that might be relevant to it. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11602 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric J. Yelk
and commented on their collective seriousness and their impact on Yelk’s victims. It considered the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11852 - 2005-03-31
and commented on their collective seriousness and their impact on Yelk’s victims. It considered the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11852 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Barneveld v. William R. Stonestreet
relies on a footnote in Swanson which commented: Unexplained erratic driving, the odor of alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12803 - 2017-09-21
relies on a footnote in Swanson which commented: Unexplained erratic driving, the odor of alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12803 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of these issues. We comment briefly on these issues. As to the suppression motion, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840012 - 2024-08-21
of these issues. We comment briefly on these issues. As to the suppression motion, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840012 - 2024-08-21