Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 64960 for or b.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the bifurcated sentence.” Sec. 973.01(2)(b)10. The extended supervision portion “may not be less than 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112719 - 2017-09-21

State of Wisconsin-Department of Corrections v. David H. Schwarz
. 973.09 (3) (b), the department preserves jurisdiction over a probationer, parolee or person on extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6714 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the bifurcated sentence.” Sec. 973.01(2)(b)10. The extended supervision portion “may not be less than 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112719 - 2014-05-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.’” (citation omitted)); see also WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). B. The Officer Had Reasonable Suspicion to Perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936846 - 2025-04-09

NOS Communications, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
in the notice provided to NOS and (b) wrongfully denying NOS’s request for a hearing. We disagree with all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5514 - 2005-03-31

Diana L. Morris v. James M. Buttney
. James M. Buttney, individually and d/b/a Northwoods Delivery Service, and Auto-Owners Insurance Company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15338 - 2005-03-31

Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
). We turn first to the Commission’s challenge to our jurisdiction.[2] Pursuant to § 332(c)(7)(B)(v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13771 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nathaniel Whaley
and theft, contrary to §§ 948.30(2)(b), 939.63(2), 943.32(1)(b) & (2), 940.225(1)(b), 940.31(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10113 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] IW Enterprises v. Ronald A. Kopas
. § 895.80(3)(b).1 Kopas and Willander also requested treble damages under WIS. STAT. § 895.80(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6721 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Mary G.
, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. MARY G., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, DAVID B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4698 - 2017-09-19