Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 63537 for records.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 63537 for records.
State v. Janelle L.I.
the law, unless by searching the record, we can find reasons to support the court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15212 - 2005-03-31
the law, unless by searching the record, we can find reasons to support the court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15212 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516986 - 2022-05-04
-CRNM 2 and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516986 - 2022-05-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision are not supported by the record, particularly the time frames relied upon by the independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161366 - 2017-09-21
decision are not supported by the record, particularly the time frames relied upon by the independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161366 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Billy J. Rachal
to disregard these mitigating factors. The court instead focused on Billy’s record of several criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3029 - 2017-09-19
to disregard these mitigating factors. The court instead focused on Billy’s record of several criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3029 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208107 - 2018-02-07
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208107 - 2018-02-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399784 - 2021-07-28
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399784 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108136 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not supported by credible evidence. We review the record to determine whether the court’s findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30813 - 2014-09-15
was not supported by credible evidence. We review the record to determine whether the court’s findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30813 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208823 - 2018-02-28
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208823 - 2018-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of Vander Heiden’s brief and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578131 - 2022-10-18
our review of Vander Heiden’s brief and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578131 - 2022-10-18