Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 63537 for records.

CA Blank Order
] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dorton filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131575 - 2014-12-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208792 - 2018-02-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an independent review of the records, the no-merit report, and Kaitlynn’s response, this court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041524 - 2025-11-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195667 - 2017-09-21

State v. Billy J. Rachal
these mitigating factors. The court instead focused on Billy’s record of several criminal convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3029 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a response. She has not done so. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794945 - 2024-05-01

CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119515 - 2014-08-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the report, but she has not done so. Upon independently reviewing the entire Record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982797 - 2025-07-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253656 - 2020-02-05

[PDF] State v. Victoria L. Stark
of discretion contemplates a process of reasoning based on facts that are of record or that are reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13784 - 2014-09-15