Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 12796 for se.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 12796 for se.
Scott Rubadeau v. David H. Schwarz
PER CURIAM. Scott Rubadeau has appealed pro se from a trial court order denying a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5082 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Scott Rubadeau has appealed pro se from a trial court order denying a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5082 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy M. Secrist
of marijuana, unlike alcohol, is per se illegal. See id. See also State v. Cooper, 636 P.2d 126, 130 (Ariz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12944 - 2005-03-31
of marijuana, unlike alcohol, is per se illegal. See id. See also State v. Cooper, 636 P.2d 126, 130 (Ariz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12944 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
properly denied postconviction counsel’s motion to withdraw so that Rowe could proceed pro se on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823112 - 2024-07-09
properly denied postconviction counsel’s motion to withdraw so that Rowe could proceed pro se on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823112 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
constitutes a per se Sixth Amendment violation. For the reasons explained herein, we are no more persuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789591 - 2024-04-17
constitutes a per se Sixth Amendment violation. For the reasons explained herein, we are no more persuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789591 - 2024-04-17
Frederick N. Spence v. John Husz
entitlement programs, and are plainly inapplicable to his situation. However, because Spence is a pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15462 - 2005-03-31
entitlement programs, and are plainly inapplicable to his situation. However, because Spence is a pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15462 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not by itself constitute a per se exigency justifying a warrantless blood draw. Reese, 353 Wis. 2d 266, ¶¶1, 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112277 - 2014-05-13
not by itself constitute a per se exigency justifying a warrantless blood draw. Reese, 353 Wis. 2d 266, ¶¶1, 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112277 - 2014-05-13
State v. Timothy J. Meddaugh
and seizures.[4] Warrantless searches are per se unreasonable unless they fall within a few carefully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3714 - 2005-03-31
and seizures.[4] Warrantless searches are per se unreasonable unless they fall within a few carefully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3714 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Janelle N. Fitzpatrick, pro se, appeals from a circuit court order that awarded Jose A. Romero Bustos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878677 - 2024-11-20
). Janelle N. Fitzpatrick, pro se, appeals from a circuit court order that awarded Jose A. Romero Bustos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878677 - 2024-11-20
County of Ashland v. John J. Jaakkola
. Affirmed. MYSE, J. John Jaakkola, pro se, appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9065 - 2005-03-31
. Affirmed. MYSE, J. John Jaakkola, pro se, appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9065 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bryce C. Nelson
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. ANALYSIS ¶10 Warrantless searches are "per se" unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15752 - 2017-09-21
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. ANALYSIS ¶10 Warrantless searches are "per se" unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15752 - 2017-09-21