Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8191 - 8200 of 17547 for ex.
Search results 8191 - 8200 of 17547 for ex.
State v. Shawn Darnell Nunnery
by writ of certiorari to the trial court, see State ex rel Lomax v. Leik, 154 Wis.2d 735, 739, 454 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12433 - 2005-03-31
by writ of certiorari to the trial court, see State ex rel Lomax v. Leik, 154 Wis.2d 735, 739, 454 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12433 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an appellant challenge the validity of any probation revocation decision in this proceeding. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
an appellant challenge the validity of any probation revocation decision in this proceeding. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sufficient reason for not previously raising an issue. State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802203 - 2024-05-16
a sufficient reason for not previously raising an issue. State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802203 - 2024-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
accord a presumption of correctness to the Board’s decision. State ex. rel. Ziervogel v. Washington Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92670 - 2013-02-12
accord a presumption of correctness to the Board’s decision. State ex. rel. Ziervogel v. Washington Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92670 - 2013-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
treatment. See State ex rel. Gendrich v. Litscher, 2001 WI App 163, ¶10, 246 Wis. 2d 814, 632 N.W.2d 878
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60994 - 2011-03-14
treatment. See State ex rel. Gendrich v. Litscher, 2001 WI App 163, ¶10, 246 Wis. 2d 814, 632 N.W.2d 878
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60994 - 2011-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. § 974.06 (2003-04) and State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 681, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28386 - 2007-03-12
. § 974.06 (2003-04) and State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 681, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28386 - 2007-03-12
James M. Esselman v. Rosemarie C. Esselman
from her ex-husband, James Esselman. Because the record supports the trial court’s determination, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6987 - 2005-03-31
from her ex-husband, James Esselman. Because the record supports the trial court’s determination, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6987 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.32 (2011-12); 1 see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); State ex rel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116143 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.32 (2011-12); 1 see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); State ex rel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116143 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of postconviction counsel. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 678-79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202548 - 2017-11-21
assistance of postconviction counsel. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 678-79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202548 - 2017-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the following opinion and order: 2014AP1195 State of Wisconsin ex rel. A’Kinbo J.S. Hashim f/k
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148201 - 2017-09-21
the following opinion and order: 2014AP1195 State of Wisconsin ex rel. A’Kinbo J.S. Hashim f/k
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148201 - 2017-09-21