Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8191 - 8200 of 65143 for or b.

[PDF] State v. Nathaniel Whaley
and theft, contrary to §§ 948.30(2)(b), 939.63(2), 943.32(1)(b) & (2), 940.225(1)(b), 940.31(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10113 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Gary Theige v. County of Vernon
.] A. B. (Here give official designation.) Done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12305 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Corporation, $10,113.60 to the State of Wisconsin Victim Compensation Program, and $166 to Adam B., one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116633 - 2017-09-21

State of Wisconsin-Department of Corrections v. David H. Schwarz
. 973.09 (3) (b), the department preserves jurisdiction over a probationer, parolee or person on extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6714 - 2005-03-31

WI App 89 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2477 Complete Title of...
, 681 N.W.2d 524, (citing Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1)(b) (1999-2000)), abrogated on other grounds by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117769 - 2014-08-26

World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Robert J. Mikulsky
., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert J. Mikulsky and Karen Mikulsky, d/b/a Enterprise Machine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2752 - 2005-03-31

Tamara S. Heibler v. Department of Workforce Development
) of medical leave for surgery. Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 103.10(5)(b), she exercised her option to substitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3757 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
clients. (a) Except as provided in par. (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110342 - 2014-04-14

State v. Derrick L. Madlock
). The operating without owner’s consent statute has its own restitution provision. See § 943.23(6)(b), Stats.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14528 - 2005-03-31

City of Beloit v. Mieke Veneman
., Ordinances § 30.05(2)(b).[7] We see no indication in the ordinance that an object is not a sign unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3429 - 2005-03-31