Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8191 - 8200 of 63537 for records.
Search results 8191 - 8200 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916182 - 2025-02-19
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916182 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698671 - 2023-09-06
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698671 - 2023-09-06
State v. Lori J. Schroeder
is or how the expert’s presence was so special to her defense. Nor does perusal of the record help
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15380 - 2005-03-31
is or how the expert’s presence was so special to her defense. Nor does perusal of the record help
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15380 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119515 - 2014-08-18
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119515 - 2014-08-18
State v. David Karich
. No written motion is of record, but the record does contain a letter brief in support of an oral motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31
. No written motion is of record, but the record does contain a letter brief in support of an oral motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91814 - 2014-09-15
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91814 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234154 - 2019-02-06
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234154 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218840 - 2018-09-12
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218840 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
record. That record included findings of deliberate exhibitionism by masturbating in front of staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130674 - 2017-09-21
record. That record included findings of deliberate exhibitionism by masturbating in front of staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130674 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218946 - 2018-09-11
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218946 - 2018-09-11