Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8191 - 8200 of 20931 for word.

[PDF] Dawn K. Larson v. Russell T. Larson
) for the proposition that a trial court must, in his words, “examine the parties directly on the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6277 - 2017-09-19

State v. Delbert L. Manke
. In other words, a prisoner must demonstrate a particularized need for them before a court will grant his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9401 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
uses “common words with known meanings” that require no particular definition. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039471 - 2025-11-20

State v. Steven A. Hipwood
to effectuate the purpose of the stop." Id. at 500. In other words, the length and the scope of the detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10297 - 2005-03-31

Associates Financial Services Company of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Jeffrey W. Abbett
, the mere fact that the trial court uttered words of “incorporation” from its previous findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14361 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dale J. Lemke
at ¶10. Confronted with these competing inferences, Childs saw, in the words of Jackson, a commonsense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3672 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Brian T. Vadnais
defense. Vadnais's election of a no contest plea was the last word on the mother's claimed dishonesty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8892 - 2017-09-19

State v. David Entis Rees
that “a determination that speech constitutes libel, obscenity, fighting words, child pornography, or something else
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4353 - 2005-03-31

Larry E. Olson v. Jon Litscher
words, a moot question is one which circumstances have rendered purely academic. Generally, moot issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15428 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Van Buren Management, Inc. v. Joseph W. Checota
on the totality of the submissions to the court by both parties. In other words, it was a finding of fact based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9239 - 2017-09-19