Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 821 - 830 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] Tri City National Bank v. Federal Insurance Company
order granting the motion to dismiss. The trial court reasoned that while Tri City experienced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6131 - 2017-09-19

Tri City National Bank v. Federal Insurance Company
memorandum order granting the motion to dismiss. The trial court reasoned that while Tri City experienced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6131 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jose Luis Mendez v. Irma Hernandez-Mendez
a divorce, joint legal custody of the children, periods of physical placement of the children, property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10974 - 2017-09-19

Jose Luis Mendez v. Irma Hernandez-Mendez
this action, seeking a divorce, joint legal custody of the children, periods of physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10974 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appeals the circuit court’s denial of his second and third postconviction motions in two cases that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678566 - 2023-07-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a joint respondents’ brief. They make several arguments. ¶4 The respondents do not appear to dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85969 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
specific reasons why Daniel was unable to attend. The county and guardian ad litem have filed a joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85969 - 2012-08-08

[PDF] Frontsheet
is presented with two issues. First, we must determine the meaning of "in custody" under Wis. Stat
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237159 - 2019-03-12

Rebecca A.J. Thomas v. Jason Michael Thomas
2001, Jason’s paycheck was deposited in the parties’ joint checking account. Jason paid additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6141 - 2005-03-31

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Margaret D.
providing for the individual’s own care or custody.” § 880.01(8). In the present case, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19703 - 2005-09-21