Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 821 - 830 of 14809 for ag.

Frontsheet
: In the interest of Sheila W., a person under the age of 18: Dane County, Petitioner-Respondent, v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99289 - 2013-09-23

[PDF] STATE OF WISCONSIN
that the minor is under 14 years of age, and  is in need of psychiatric services, or services
/formdisplay/ME-922.pdf?formNumber=ME-922&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2024-01-05

State v. Cedric Holze
”); see also Wis. Stat. § 948.01(1) (“‘Child’ means a person who has not attained the age of 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6559 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Cedric Holze
conduct”); see also WIS. STAT. § 948.01(1) (“‘Child’ means a person who has not attained the age of 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6559 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Training module resources
and has used multiple dates of birth? • What age do you use when: (a) a PSA was previously completed
/courts/programs/docs/trainmoduleres.pdf - 2022-03-01

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 20-06 - Letter Response to the Court from Jacquelynn Rothstein
, the emeritus provision has been administered without incident. Attorneys age seventy (70) and older may
/supreme/docs/2006letter.pdf - 2021-01-26

[PDF] JG-1606 Dispositional Order Appointing Guardian (48.977, Wis. Stats.)
STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY IN THE INTEREST OF a person under the age
/formdisplay/JG-1606.pdf?formNumber=JG-1606&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-11-25

State v. Brian S.
of Brian S., A Person Under the Age of 18: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12697 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brian S.
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II IN THE INTEREST OF BRIAN S., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12697 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, and that, combined with his age and other personal characteristics, made the sentence too harsh. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34976 - 2008-12-22