Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 821 - 830 of 29326 for er.
Search results 821 - 830 of 29326 for er.
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
erred in dismissing his petition under that subsection. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31
erred in dismissing his petition under that subsection. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mike Brolin v. Kim Bauers
appeals from a judgment of eviction. Bauers contends that the trial court erred because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21508 - 2017-09-21
appeals from a judgment of eviction. Bauers contends that the trial court erred because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21508 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to modify child placement.1 Grogan contends that the court erred by denying the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267975 - 2020-07-09
motion to modify child placement.1 Grogan contends that the court erred by denying the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267975 - 2020-07-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
relevant. Dohm’s appellate brief sets forth three issues: (1) whether the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35552 - 2014-09-15
relevant. Dohm’s appellate brief sets forth three issues: (1) whether the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35552 - 2014-09-15
Mike Brolin v. Kim Bauers
erred because it did not consider evidence that the eviction was retaliatory or determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21508 - 2006-02-22
erred because it did not consider evidence that the eviction was retaliatory or determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21508 - 2006-02-22
Vadim Katznelson v. Stuart Hoffman
of negligence. Katznelson argues that the trial court erred in dismissing his action because none of his three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9623 - 2005-03-31
of negligence. Katznelson argues that the trial court erred in dismissing his action because none of his three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9623 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott D. Dahlen
that there was insufficient evidence at trial to support the burglary charge. He also argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15907 - 2005-03-31
that there was insufficient evidence at trial to support the burglary charge. He also argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15907 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
rights, arguing that the circuit court erred in granting a default hearing when she failed to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3920 - 2017-09-20
rights, arguing that the circuit court erred in granting a default hearing when she failed to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3920 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. Martin-Andrade argues: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252215 - 2020-01-14
his motion for postconviction relief. Martin-Andrade argues: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252215 - 2020-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred by not ruling on his request for rescission of the purchase contract. Apart from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217385 - 2018-08-09
court erred by not ruling on his request for rescission of the purchase contract. Apart from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217385 - 2018-08-09