Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8201 - 8210 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 8201 - 8210 of 16449 for commentating.
COURT OF APPEALS
was commenting on one of the two ways the County could satisfy the “substantial probability of physical harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72857 - 2011-10-24
was commenting on one of the two ways the County could satisfy the “substantial probability of physical harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72857 - 2011-10-24
State v. Thomas Godschalx
on remand. We stated: In light of these comments by the [sentencing] court, we cannot say with any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3869 - 2005-03-31
on remand. We stated: In light of these comments by the [sentencing] court, we cannot say with any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3869 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that a defendant may seek to reopen the enhanced sentence. It did not comment on an offender’s entitlement to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39785 - 2009-08-19
that a defendant may seek to reopen the enhanced sentence. It did not comment on an offender’s entitlement to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39785 - 2009-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable basis to pursue any of these issues. We briefly comment on them. Before accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016020 - 2025-09-30
that there is no arguable basis to pursue any of these issues. We briefly comment on them. Before accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016020 - 2025-09-30
State v. Eureka Scruggs
that Scruggs refused to do the killing, commenting that “for a citizen to respond to someone else that I’m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
that Scruggs refused to do the killing, commenting that “for a citizen to respond to someone else that I’m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John S. Bergmann
the court has ever seen.” We agree with the State that this comment reflected the court’s consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15018 - 2017-09-21
the court has ever seen.” We agree with the State that this comment reflected the court’s consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15018 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
him was. After the officer explained, Frisch commented that he may have been on the wrong side
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94977 - 2013-04-03
him was. After the officer explained, Frisch commented that he may have been on the wrong side
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94977 - 2013-04-03
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
13-11D: In the Matter of the Amendment to the Comment to Supreme Court Rule 10.03(4) (b)(2
/sc/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439667 - 2021-10-07
13-11D: In the Matter of the Amendment to the Comment to Supreme Court Rule 10.03(4) (b)(2
/sc/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439667 - 2021-10-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
during their sentencing comments that Strupp lacked responsibility for this crime. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69082 - 2014-09-15
during their sentencing comments that Strupp lacked responsibility for this crime. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69082 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which would be Silvers, made repeated comments that James had “talk[ed] shit” to him earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15
, which would be Silvers, made repeated comments that James had “talk[ed] shit” to him earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15