Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8211 - 8220 of 16451 for commenting.

[PDF] State v. Craig A. Sommer
points to the trial court's comments that “the risk factor” was “the primary concern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8156 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reveals no improper comments by the court. We therefore affirm. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424507 - 2021-09-14

COURT OF APPEALS
The trial court did not expressly comment on either witness’s credibility. When a trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41824 - 2009-10-05

State v. Jeffrey Benes
Benes’s having maintained his right to remain silent and also improperly commented on Benes’s invocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14770 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
13-11D: In the Matter of the Amendment to the Comment to Supreme Court Rule 10.03(4) (b)(2
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439770 - 2021-10-07

COURT OF APPEALS
William Lloyd Prosser commented: “Intent … is broader than a desire to bring about physical results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26607 - 2006-10-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
commented on. As the court’s instructions and special verdict form given to the jury cured any prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104715 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the statements made by Rachel’s mother at sentencing. The court’s comments as a whole, however, do not reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256932 - 2020-04-14

State v. Dawn L. Grawey
that isolated comments that the defendant “didn’t believe in needles” and “d[id]n’t want AIDS,” coupled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4893 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mary F.-R.
reflects that, throughout the trial, Mary F.-R. continually commented on the credibility of witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9700 - 2017-09-19