Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8211 - 8220 of 24556 for extending.
Search results 8211 - 8220 of 24556 for extending.
State v. Alvin E. Moore
had his probation extended for two years. In his no merit report, counsel states that Moore believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10911 - 2005-03-31
had his probation extended for two years. In his no merit report, counsel states that Moore believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Martin Foral
probation period, the court, for cause and by order, may extend probation for a stated period or modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12597 - 2017-09-21
probation period, the court, for cause and by order, may extend probation for a stated period or modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12597 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses potential issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217671 - 2018-08-15
of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses potential issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217671 - 2018-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1019346 - 2025-10-08
years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1019346 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-three years of initial confinement and twenty-three years of extended supervision. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111192 - 2017-09-21
-three years of initial confinement and twenty-three years of extended supervision. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111192 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alfred J. Spears
for three years. In January 1997, his probation was extended by two years for failure to pay restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13778 - 2005-03-31
for three years. In January 1997, his probation was extended by two years for failure to pay restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13778 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and ten years of extended supervision. He argues that the circuit court’s comments do not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71632 - 2011-10-03
confinement and ten years of extended supervision. He argues that the circuit court’s comments do not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71632 - 2011-10-03
Heritage Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.
consent. Therefore, we conclude that the holding in Gimbles does not extend to a discovery bond
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10547 - 2005-03-31
consent. Therefore, we conclude that the holding in Gimbles does not extend to a discovery bond
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. The court awarded Walter 581 days of sentence credit. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017772 - 2025-10-02
of extended supervision. The court awarded Walter 581 days of sentence credit. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017772 - 2025-10-02
CA Blank Order
, consisting of sixteen years’ initial confinement and nine years’ extended supervision, concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141759 - 2015-05-18
, consisting of sixteen years’ initial confinement and nine years’ extended supervision, concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141759 - 2015-05-18