Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
and custody. (b) The individual … is an adult who has been determined to be incompetent by a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138472 - 2015-03-31
and custody. (b) The individual … is an adult who has been determined to be incompetent by a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138472 - 2015-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
); and (2) declining to suppress all portions of Harper’s custodial statement to police. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85724 - 2012-08-07
); and (2) declining to suppress all portions of Harper’s custodial statement to police. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85724 - 2012-08-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: (a) The individual has a primary need for residential care and custody. (b) The individual … is an adult who has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138472 - 2017-09-21
: (a) The individual has a primary need for residential care and custody. (b) The individual … is an adult who has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138472 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James W. Foseid v. State Bank of Cross Plains
that the trial court did not apply correct legal standards in ruling on the postverdict motions, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7798 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court did not apply correct legal standards in ruling on the postverdict motions, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7798 - 2017-09-19
James W. Foseid v. State Bank of Cross Plains
conclude that the trial court did not apply correct legal standards in ruling on the postverdict motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7798 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the trial court did not apply correct legal standards in ruling on the postverdict motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7798 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. Turner
into custody in the vicinity of the homes. Turner had been observed throwing something as officers approached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15749 - 2005-03-31
into custody in the vicinity of the homes. Turner had been observed throwing something as officers approached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15749 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gustavo Espino
) in denying his motion to suppress his statements to the police; (2) in dismissing a prospective juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12575 - 2005-03-31
) in denying his motion to suppress his statements to the police; (2) in dismissing a prospective juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12575 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The trial court denied Donald’s motion notwithstanding the verdict, held a dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77429 - 2012-01-31
. The trial court denied Donald’s motion notwithstanding the verdict, held a dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77429 - 2012-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
offense, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jordan argues he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42082 - 2009-10-13
offense, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jordan argues he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42082 - 2009-10-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. 2 We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Socha initially was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132818 - 2017-09-21
his motion for postconviction relief. 2 We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Socha initially was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132818 - 2017-09-21