Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 84336 for case number.

Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/thirdbranch/mar23/index.htm - 2026-02-24

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=106&year=2009

State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
asserts that his trial counsel was ineffective because he referred to the complainant as “victim number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
number five” under circumstances where the jury would otherwise not know of alleged incidents involving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2650 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the City’s case, Wiest moved for a directed verdict. He argued that the City failed to establish the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763927 - 2024-02-15

[PDF] Comments on Supreme Court rule 16-04 - J. Denis Moran
the overall number of practitioners, much less the proportion who are attorneys. While there are statutory
/supreme/docs/1604commentsmoran.pdf - 2016-12-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
”). Additionally, Janine argues that her trial counsel was ineffective by failing to object at a number of key
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546154 - 2022-07-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
not rebutted are admitted). To minimize the confusion occasioned by multiple trial court case numbers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99430 - 2013-07-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the cases against Lusk by case number only in our “Procedural History” section; however, later in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99430 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Benjamin M.R.
argument in this case on November 9, 1995, and announced its tentative decision. The court also ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10062 - 2017-09-19