Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years’ extended supervision, to run consecutive to Bearheart’s sentence in a Douglas County case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252142 - 2020-01-07
years’ extended supervision, to run consecutive to Bearheart’s sentence in a Douglas County case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252142 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence of six years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision. This no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=949285 - 2025-05-07
sentence of six years of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision. This no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=949285 - 2025-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of three years of initial confinement, three years of extended supervision, and a fine of $2400
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331173 - 2021-02-03
of three years of initial confinement, three years of extended supervision, and a fine of $2400
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331173 - 2021-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and three years of extended supervision. The circuit court accepted Madding’s guilty plea and followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523193 - 2022-05-19
and three years of extended supervision. The circuit court accepted Madding’s guilty plea and followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523193 - 2022-05-19
City of Appleton v. Richard J. Wood
, it provides that where the statute requires conformity, that conformity does not extend to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8306 - 2005-03-31
, it provides that where the statute requires conformity, that conformity does not extend to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8306 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. The parties stipulated to 290 days of sentence credit. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=620443 - 2023-02-14
years of extended supervision. The parties stipulated to 290 days of sentence credit. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=620443 - 2023-02-14
CA Blank Order
, consisting of sixteen years’ initial confinement and nine years’ extended supervision, concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141759 - 2015-05-18
, consisting of sixteen years’ initial confinement and nine years’ extended supervision, concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141759 - 2015-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Knight’s pleas were entered knowingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285938 - 2020-09-09
of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Knight’s pleas were entered knowingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285938 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses potential issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217671 - 2018-08-15
of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses potential issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217671 - 2018-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and fifteen years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243747 - 2019-07-17
confinement and fifteen years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243747 - 2019-07-17