Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 68926 for he.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 68926 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Nathan John Lalor
Nos. 99-0957 00-0552 2 facility based upon a determination that he is a sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2322 - 2017-09-19
Nos. 99-0957 00-0552 2 facility based upon a determination that he is a sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2322 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anou Lo
, we affirm. Specifically, Lo claims that defense counsel was ineffective because: (1) he failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11915 - 2017-09-21
, we affirm. Specifically, Lo claims that defense counsel was ineffective because: (1) he failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11915 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian T. Ladwig
)(h)1, Stats. Ladwig argues that the trial court erred by not suppressing two statements he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14522 - 2005-03-31
)(h)1, Stats. Ladwig argues that the trial court erred by not suppressing two statements he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14522 - 2005-03-31
Donald J. Parker v. Rod Buck
providing him notice or an opportunity to respond. We disagree. He also argues his right to a fair trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7549 - 2005-03-31
providing him notice or an opportunity to respond. We disagree. He also argues his right to a fair trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7549 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Stutesman
contrary to § 948.22(3) (misdemeanor), as a repeater. He also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13134 - 2017-09-21
contrary to § 948.22(3) (misdemeanor), as a repeater. He also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13134 - 2017-09-21
State v. Terrance A. Garner
and 939.63 (1999-2000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Garner claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3775 - 2005-03-31
and 939.63 (1999-2000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Garner claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3775 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170941 - 2017-09-21
appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170941 - 2017-09-21
State v. Guenther Kirchhuebel
, Stats. Kirchhuebel claims that he established by a preponderance of the evidence that he was physically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13966 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. Kirchhuebel claims that he established by a preponderance of the evidence that he was physically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13966 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stoflet was fifty-four years old at the time. He remained on the Library’s payroll through February 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108399 - 2014-02-24
. Stoflet was fifty-four years old at the time. He remained on the Library’s payroll through February 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108399 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Specifically, he argues that because he showed up for some hearings, moved for visitation in March 2016
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192669 - 2017-09-21
. Specifically, he argues that because he showed up for some hearings, moved for visitation in March 2016
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192669 - 2017-09-21