Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 75055 for judgment for us.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 75055 for judgment for us.
Certification
this relief; (3) if it does not, whether this court may use its power of discretionary reversal under Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35113 - 2009-01-07
this relief; (3) if it does not, whether this court may use its power of discretionary reversal under Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35113 - 2009-01-07
[PDF]
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEALS from judgments of the circuit court for Washington County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=809234 - 2024-06-05
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEALS from judgments of the circuit court for Washington County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=809234 - 2024-06-05
[PDF]
Steven Woerpel v. Reg Gill
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Iowa County: JAMES P. FIEDLER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11298 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Iowa County: JAMES P. FIEDLER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11298 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2008AP697-CR Cir. Ct. No. 1998CF486
. STAT. § 974.06, this court may not use that power to reach back to vacate the original judgment
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35113 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. § 974.06, this court may not use that power to reach back to vacate the original judgment
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35113 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kirk L. Griese
judgment, it is not necessary for us to address Griese’s claim that the trial court also erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7055 - 2017-09-20
judgment, it is not necessary for us to address Griese’s claim that the trial court also erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7055 - 2017-09-20
State v. Kirk L. Griese
version unless otherwise noted. [2] Because we reverse the appealed judgment, it is not necessary for us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7055 - 2005-03-31
version unless otherwise noted. [2] Because we reverse the appealed judgment, it is not necessary for us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7055 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago County: MICHAEL S. GIBBS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970388 - 2025-06-18
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago County: MICHAEL S. GIBBS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970388 - 2025-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
and represented its will, not its judgment, because it denied the variance based on its disapproval of the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60905 - 2011-03-15
and represented its will, not its judgment, because it denied the variance based on its disapproval of the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60905 - 2011-03-15
William P. Fischer v. Andray A. Zhurbas
for summary judgment. Zhurbas argues, among other things, that the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15071 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment. Zhurbas argues, among other things, that the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15071 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is marked, so it is not clear to us whether an amended judgment of conviction should be entered. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155719 - 2017-09-21
is marked, so it is not clear to us whether an amended judgment of conviction should be entered. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155719 - 2017-09-21