Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8231 - 8240 of 63679 for Motion for joint custody.

[MS WORD] JD-1746: Dispositional Order - Protection or Services (Chapter 938)
)/guardian, and the transfer of legal custody is necessary. |_| 6. Restitution
/formdisplay/JD-1746.doc?formNumber=JD-1746&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-01-08

COURT OF APPEALS
with respect to custody where both parties go in equally positioned and there is – in the ordinary situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36792 - 2009-06-15

[PDF] NOTICE
. § 767.41(5)(am) provides: [I]n determining legal custody and periods of physical placement, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33343 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
care and custody and that Alicia would not be able to “safely maintain herself” if she lived alone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89327 - 2012-11-13

[PDF] NOTICE
, this is not the same as the best interest standard in family court with respect to custody where both parties go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36792 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Michelle Wood v. Phillip J. DeHahn
was awarded sole legal custody of their two minor children. DeHahn is a member of the Church of Latter Day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11871 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Aman Deep Singh, pro se, appeals the order denying his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09

MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
" statute, and from an order denying their motion for reconsideration.[1] The PSC concluded that MCI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8857 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
an order denying their No. 95-0915 -2- motion for reconsideration.1 The PSC concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8857 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court held a joint evidentiary hearing on the refusal and a suppression motion in the OWI case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88676 - 2014-09-15