Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8231 - 8240 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 8231 - 8240 of 69366 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment entered upon his pleas and from the denial of his postconviction motion. He raises a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827597 - 2024-07-24
the judgment entered upon his pleas and from the denial of his postconviction motion. He raises a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827597 - 2024-07-24
[PDF]
State v. Corey Miller
) and 939.63, STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Miller claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12493 - 2017-09-21
) and 939.63, STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Miller claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12493 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his guilty pleas and an order denying his postconviction motion.1 Suscha asserts that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040157 - 2025-11-19
his guilty pleas and an order denying his postconviction motion.1 Suscha asserts that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040157 - 2025-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and criminal damage to property. He was also found guilty of burglary, stalking, and bail jumping. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102716 - 2017-09-21
and criminal damage to property. He was also found guilty of burglary, stalking, and bail jumping. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102716 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven S. Walter
of a blood test. He contends that the warrantless seizure of blood from his person was unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16182 - 2017-09-21
of a blood test. He contends that the warrantless seizure of blood from his person was unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16182 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Guzman
of conviction entered after he pled guilty to two counts of delivery of a controlled substance (cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15351 - 2017-09-21
of conviction entered after he pled guilty to two counts of delivery of a controlled substance (cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15351 - 2017-09-21
County of Jefferson v. John H. Newkirk
a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1).[2] He contends the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2142 - 2005-03-31
a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1).[2] He contends the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2142 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barry R. Drews
any notion that the driver may choose which test he or she will take. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15933 - 2005-03-31
any notion that the driver may choose which test he or she will take. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15933 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and convicted of violating the restraining order and criminal damage to property. He was also found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102716 - 2013-10-07
and convicted of violating the restraining order and criminal damage to property. He was also found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102716 - 2013-10-07
Frontsheet
. Stat. § 948.02(1) (2003-04).[1] Davis sought to suppress all oral and written statements he provided
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33224 - 2008-06-25
. Stat. § 948.02(1) (2003-04).[1] Davis sought to suppress all oral and written statements he provided
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33224 - 2008-06-25