Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8231 - 8240 of 81853 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 8231 - 8240 of 81853 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
State v. Frank Miles
is whether a prior drug conviction is an element of the offense of felony possession of THC, pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12468 - 2005-03-31
is whether a prior drug conviction is an element of the offense of felony possession of THC, pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12468 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
. § 346.04(3). He appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for dismissal of the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21
. § 346.04(3). He appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for dismissal of the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
of Wis. Stat. § 346.04(3). He appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
of Wis. Stat. § 346.04(3). He appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
Mary H.-P. v. State
an order of the circuit court for Columbia County: RICHARD REHM, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12109 - 2005-03-31
an order of the circuit court for Columbia County: RICHARD REHM, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12109 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary H.-P. v. State
-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Columbia County: RICHARD REHM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12109 - 2017-09-21
-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Columbia County: RICHARD REHM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12109 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
obtained DNA samples from the victim. The appellate court affirmed an order suppressing the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55160 - 2014-09-15
obtained DNA samples from the victim. The appellate court affirmed an order suppressing the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55160 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Perez, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55160 - 2010-10-04
Perez, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55160 - 2010-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2018AP2373-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248856 - 2019-10-16
are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2018AP2373-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248856 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, WI 53950-4000 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198100 - 2017-10-25
, WI 53950-4000 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198100 - 2017-10-25
[PDF]
State v. Eric R. George
and an order of the circuit court for Ozaukee County: JOSEPH D. McCORMACK, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4497 - 2017-09-19
and an order of the circuit court for Ozaukee County: JOSEPH D. McCORMACK, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4497 - 2017-09-19