Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 82361 - 82370 of 87338 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 82361 - 82370 of 87338 for affidavit of filing.
[PDF]
Zettie Nicks v. George A. Nicks
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9440 - 2017-09-19
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9440 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jackie Franklin v. Michael Jackson
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8260 - 2017-09-19
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8260 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Carole Hungerford v. State
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11999 - 2017-09-21
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11999 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
16, 2008. Nearly two years later, Brown, acting pro se, filed additional motions to suppress which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95174 - 2013-04-04
16, 2008. Nearly two years later, Brown, acting pro se, filed additional motions to suppress which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95174 - 2013-04-04
State v. Billie T. Hill
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8256 - 2005-03-31
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8256 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven G. Loveday
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11407 - 2017-09-19
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11407 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven Saivong
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9028 - 2005-03-31
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9028 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), and the reason for the amendment is that briefs are now electronically filed in PDF format
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806865 - 2024-05-31
), and the reason for the amendment is that briefs are now electronically filed in PDF format
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806865 - 2024-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Thomas filed a motion to suppress the evidence from his blood test, arguing that he “did not possess
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017776 - 2025-10-02
. Thomas filed a motion to suppress the evidence from his blood test, arguing that he “did not possess
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017776 - 2025-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
being convicted of a felony. Appointed appellate counsel, Angela Conrad Kachelski, filed a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=438582 - 2021-10-12
being convicted of a felony. Appointed appellate counsel, Angela Conrad Kachelski, filed a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=438582 - 2021-10-12