Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8241 - 8250 of 69092 for he.
Search results 8241 - 8250 of 69092 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion seeking a new trial. On appeal, Bailey argues that he should receive a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106741 - 2014-01-14
postconviction motion seeking a new trial. On appeal, Bailey argues that he should receive a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106741 - 2014-01-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
of an intoxicant, third offense, and the order of the circuit court denying his motion to suppress evidence. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41943 - 2014-09-15
of an intoxicant, third offense, and the order of the circuit court denying his motion to suppress evidence. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41943 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Terrance A. Garner
. STAT. §§ 940.02(1), No. 01-0838-CR 2 939.05 and 939.63 (1999-2000). 1 He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3775 - 2017-09-19
. STAT. §§ 940.02(1), No. 01-0838-CR 2 939.05 and 939.63 (1999-2000). 1 He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3775 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stoflet was fifty-four years old at the time. He remained on the Library’s payroll through February 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108399 - 2014-02-24
. Stoflet was fifty-four years old at the time. He remained on the Library’s payroll through February 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108399 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
(PR) filed. He challenged the inclusion and validity of two debt instruments listed as assets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50332 - 2014-09-15
(PR) filed. He challenged the inclusion and validity of two debt instruments listed as assets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50332 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) and 346.65(2) (2005‑06).[3] He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
)(a) and 346.65(2) (2005‑06).[3] He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
State v. Lindell Joe
imprisonment and battery. Joe appeals from the judgment of conviction. He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7895 - 2005-03-31
imprisonment and battery. Joe appeals from the judgment of conviction. He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7895 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order affirming the revocation of his parole. He argues that he was denied due process because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34541 - 2008-11-11
an order affirming the revocation of his parole. He argues that he was denied due process because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34541 - 2008-11-11
State v. Robert W. Stutesman
support contrary to § 948.22(3) (misdemeanor), as a repeater. He also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13134 - 2005-03-31
support contrary to § 948.22(3) (misdemeanor), as a repeater. He also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13134 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian T. Ladwig
)(h)1, Stats. Ladwig argues that the trial court erred by not suppressing two statements he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14522 - 2005-03-31
)(h)1, Stats. Ladwig argues that the trial court erred by not suppressing two statements he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14522 - 2005-03-31