Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 82461 - 82470 of 87338 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 82461 - 82470 of 87338 for affidavit of filing.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Mengestu was convicted and sentenced to a fine. Mengestu filed a postconviction motion seeking a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865519 - 2024-10-23
. Mengestu was convicted and sentenced to a fine. Mengestu filed a postconviction motion seeking a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865519 - 2024-10-23
CA Blank Order
. Attorney Dennis Schertz, appointed counsel for Gilbert Sanchez, has filed a no-merit report seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109467 - 2014-03-19
. Attorney Dennis Schertz, appointed counsel for Gilbert Sanchez, has filed a no-merit report seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109467 - 2014-03-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was not ineffective for failing to file a meritless motion). The court did not err by denying Nush’s ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1113569 - 2026-05-06
was not ineffective for failing to file a meritless motion). The court did not err by denying Nush’s ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1113569 - 2026-05-06
State v. Jerry Grillo
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED July 15, 1997 NOTICE A party may file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12162 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED July 15, 1997 NOTICE A party may file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did Jones challenge the requirement that he pay restitution, nor did he file any motion after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131969 - 2017-09-21
did Jones challenge the requirement that he pay restitution, nor did he file any motion after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Maurice Schirmacher v. Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11693 - 2017-09-20
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11693 - 2017-09-20
Myra Levine (Heilprin) v. Richard Heilprin
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8544 - 2005-03-31
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brett E. Alford
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11649 - 2017-09-19
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11649 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Amy Weisman v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7710 - 2017-09-19
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7710 - 2017-09-19
Michael W. Hilger v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8657 - 2005-03-31
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8657 - 2005-03-31