Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8251 - 8260 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 8251 - 8260 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We reject his contention that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133873 - 2017-09-21
and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We reject his contention that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133873 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Armando Trevino v. Ladd & Milaeger
claims that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment dismissing his legal malpractice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3972 - 2017-09-20
claims that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment dismissing his legal malpractice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3972 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jerold L. Rober
of the circuit court denying his motion for sentence modification. Rober contends that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21028 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court denying his motion for sentence modification. Rober contends that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21028 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Randy Duncan v. Kenneth Gillingham
that agreement NO. 96-1786 3 cannot be reached, then I will bring a motion seeking an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11008 - 2017-09-19
that agreement NO. 96-1786 3 cannot be reached, then I will bring a motion seeking an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11008 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
, dismiss this appeal without prejudice, and extend the deadline for Benson to file a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98849 - 2013-06-27
, dismiss this appeal without prejudice, and extend the deadline for Benson to file a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98849 - 2013-06-27
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2012
(ALJ). Best Buy moved to dismiss on grounds of claim preclusion. The ALJ granted Best Buy’s motion
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78980 - 2014-09-15
(ALJ). Best Buy moved to dismiss on grounds of claim preclusion. The ALJ granted Best Buy’s motion
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78980 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion seeking to dismiss the case. He claimed that the State could not use two prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
a motion seeking to dismiss the case. He claimed that the State could not use two prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a motion seeking to dismiss the case. He claimed that the State could not use two prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
filed a motion seeking to dismiss the case. He claimed that the State could not use two prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew T. Luening - 2020AP002166
dismissed; remanded to referee for further proceedings. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This matter was scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627062 - 2023-04-17
dismissed; remanded to referee for further proceedings. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This matter was scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627062 - 2023-04-17
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew T. Luening - 2020AP002166
dismissed; remanded to referee for further proceedings. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This matter was scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699918 - 2023-09-01
dismissed; remanded to referee for further proceedings. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This matter was scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699918 - 2023-09-01