Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8251 - 8260 of 50071 for our.
Search results 8251 - 8260 of 50071 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
our courts “recognize[] the importance of citizen informants, and, accordingly, apply a relaxed test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
our courts “recognize[] the importance of citizen informants, and, accordingly, apply a relaxed test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
State v. Christopher L. Graef
for our analysis. All of his arguments are easily translated into a reasonable suspicion framework
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6418 - 2005-03-31
for our analysis. All of his arguments are easily translated into a reasonable suspicion framework
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6418 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
that the trial court’s sentencing decision was erroneous. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AND APPLICABLE LAW ¶10 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28484 - 2007-03-19
that the trial court’s sentencing decision was erroneous. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AND APPLICABLE LAW ¶10 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28484 - 2007-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and an appropriate application of the law. Id. Our role as an appellate court is to search the record for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79514 - 2012-03-19
and an appropriate application of the law. Id. Our role as an appellate court is to search the record for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79514 - 2012-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the established exceptions, is unconstitutional. This argument has been resolved by our decision in Prado
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282446 - 2020-08-27
of the established exceptions, is unconstitutional. This argument has been resolved by our decision in Prado
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282446 - 2020-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2013-14 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2014AP2471-CRNM 2 our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178726 - 2017-09-21
are to the 2013-14 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2014AP2471-CRNM 2 our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178726 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 129
a sledgehammer to crack a nut. The problems with electronic discovery in our state's courts are few
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56727 - 2014-09-15
a sledgehammer to crack a nut. The problems with electronic discovery in our state's courts are few
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56727 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be allowed to withdraw his pleas because they were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742154 - 2023-12-19
be allowed to withdraw his pleas because they were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742154 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, based on our de novo review using the proper legal standard, we affirm the court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175611 - 2017-09-21
. However, based on our de novo review using the proper legal standard, we affirm the court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175611 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals. ¶5 We include additional facts as necessary to our discussion below. DISCUSSION I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051064 - 2025-12-17
appeals. ¶5 We include additional facts as necessary to our discussion below. DISCUSSION I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051064 - 2025-12-17