Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8251 - 8260 of 16073 for probate.
Search results 8251 - 8260 of 16073 for probate.
Appeal No
and the conduct underlying sentencing, yet in Beets there was a clear relationship. Beets was on probation when
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26690 - 2006-10-04
and the conduct underlying sentencing, yet in Beets there was a clear relationship. Beets was on probation when
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26690 - 2006-10-04
COURT OF APPEALS
questioned by his probation agent prior to his interview with police.[3] Thus, Metz believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79456 - 2012-03-13
questioned by his probation agent prior to his interview with police.[3] Thus, Metz believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79456 - 2012-03-13
State v. Randy D. Stafford
. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation and the probation agent required Stafford to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4991 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation and the probation agent required Stafford to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4991 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey A.M.
. She received a twenty-two-year prison sentence followed by twenty years’ probation in lieu of a stayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7008 - 2005-03-31
. She received a twenty-two-year prison sentence followed by twenty years’ probation in lieu of a stayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7008 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
happened.” Buschmann testified that he knew the voice was Howard’s because Howard’s probation agent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191355 - 2017-09-21
happened.” Buschmann testified that he knew the voice was Howard’s because Howard’s probation agent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 9
of two of the estates for which he served as guardian. He was placed on probation for three years
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60079 - 2014-09-15
of two of the estates for which he served as guardian. He was placed on probation for three years
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60079 - 2014-09-15
State v. Aaron N.
to limit [the State’s] options.” The State responded that it would likely recommend long-term probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6671 - 2005-03-31
to limit [the State’s] options.” The State responded that it would likely recommend long-term probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6671 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
court was mindful that Russ already had an opportunity for probation that ha[d] not been successful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31786 - 2014-09-15
court was mindful that Russ already had an opportunity for probation that ha[d] not been successful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31786 - 2014-09-15
State v. Aaron N.
to limit [the State’s] options.” The State responded that it would likely recommend long-term probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6670 - 2005-03-31
to limit [the State’s] options.” The State responded that it would likely recommend long-term probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6670 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
questioned by his probation agent prior to his interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79456 - 2014-09-15
questioned by his probation agent prior to his interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79456 - 2014-09-15