Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 82561 - 82570 of 87338 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 82561 - 82570 of 87338 for affidavit of filing.
[PDF]
State v. David L. Canedy
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10351 - 2017-09-20
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10351 - 2017-09-20
State v. Gary R. Knutson
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9469 - 2005-03-31
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9469 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Janice L. Geline v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11454 - 2017-09-19
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11454 - 2017-09-19
Thomas A. Reed v. Beaver Dam Community Hospitals, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED May 22, 1997 NOTICE A party may file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11892 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED May 22, 1997 NOTICE A party may file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11892 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jheri R. Johnson
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7799 - 2005-03-31
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7799 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), and the reason for the amendment is that briefs are now electronically filed in PDF format
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916427 - 2025-02-20
), and the reason for the amendment is that briefs are now electronically filed in PDF format
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916427 - 2025-02-20
Randy Duncan v. Kenneth Gillingham
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED August 7, 1997 NOTICE A party may file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11008 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED August 7, 1997 NOTICE A party may file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11008 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the debt, rather than file for bankruptcy. He argues that this provision meant only that Jennifer Perry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218336 - 2018-08-27
the debt, rather than file for bankruptcy. He argues that this provision meant only that Jennifer Perry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218336 - 2018-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
began serving his fifteen-year stayed sentence. In 2015, Noel filed a “motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170948 - 2017-09-21
began serving his fifteen-year stayed sentence. In 2015, Noel filed a “motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170948 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a DNA sample, unless previously provided, and payment of the $250 DNA surcharge. Harris filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218833 - 2018-09-12
a DNA sample, unless previously provided, and payment of the $250 DNA surcharge. Harris filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218833 - 2018-09-12