Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8271 - 8280 of 16411 for commenting.
Search results 8271 - 8280 of 16411 for commenting.
COURT OF APPEALS
classmates that about a week and a half before the shooting, Hainstock had commented that he didn’t think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05
classmates that about a week and a half before the shooting, Hainstock had commented that he didn’t think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sommer
points to the trial court's comments that “the risk factor” was “the primary concern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8156 - 2017-09-19
points to the trial court's comments that “the risk factor” was “the primary concern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8156 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Timothy D. Kingstad
made clear by the court’s comment, quoted above, that she was fining him $2500 “knowing [he] can’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15474 - 2017-09-21
made clear by the court’s comment, quoted above, that she was fining him $2500 “knowing [he] can’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15474 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court’s sentencing comments as a whole show that it believed Love was more mature in some ways due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108114 - 2014-02-17
The circuit court’s sentencing comments as a whole show that it believed Love was more mature in some ways due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108114 - 2014-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
from the courtroom. ¶12 Other than commenting that an altercation was “unacceptable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34707 - 2008-11-24
from the courtroom. ¶12 Other than commenting that an altercation was “unacceptable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34707 - 2008-11-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
if we concluded that Kosobud had not yet refused when the officer made the not-“necessary” comment, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28346 - 2014-09-15
if we concluded that Kosobud had not yet refused when the officer made the not-“necessary” comment, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28346 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
illness.” The colloquy leading to that comment unfolded as follows, after the court questioned whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34301 - 2008-10-14
illness.” The colloquy leading to that comment unfolded as follows, after the court questioned whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34301 - 2008-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factor. Nothing in the court’s sentencing comments or the judgments of conviction indicates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226705 - 2018-11-06
factor. Nothing in the court’s sentencing comments or the judgments of conviction indicates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226705 - 2018-11-06
State v. James F. Weber
and arguably shortly after the closed hunting hours. The court weighed the comments from the victim’s family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15646 - 2005-03-31
and arguably shortly after the closed hunting hours. The court weighed the comments from the victim’s family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15646 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
Boose. The trial court addressed the gravity of the offense, commenting about the impact it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27239 - 2006-11-27
Boose. The trial court addressed the gravity of the offense, commenting about the impact it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27239 - 2006-11-27