Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8271 - 8280 of 61737 for does.

COURT OF APPEALS
that Rodriguez was ineligible for caretaker benefits based on his admission that his wife does not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48448 - 2010-03-29

State v. Glenn Van Remmen
if this court were to assume (as it does not) that Van Remmen is not judicially estopped from asserting that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12481 - 2005-03-31

State v. David W. Pender
. While Pender’s own testimony does contradict that of the officers, this is insufficient to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12582 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dwayne E. Hudson
the imposition of a consecutive sentence on Hudson. We disagree. Hall does not stand for such a narrow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18444 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the administrative law judge and the commission committed fraud. The commission’s brief on appeal does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139857 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
aggravated by Myers’ prior criminal record, the sentence does not “shock public sentiment and violate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121953 - 2014-09-23

[PDF] State v. Richard D. Hubatch
, and the district No. 97-2627-FT 3 attorney should [prosecute] the case.” The state does not contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12995 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Attorney’s Office has objected.” As the State acknowledges, § 973.195(1r)(d) does not apply to Miller’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241817 - 2019-06-12

William D. Purdy and Lisa Purdy v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
for the Purdys' and Mrs. Hederer's injuries. We conclude that it does, and therefore reverse the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8633 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 95-01 In the Matter of the Amendment of SCR: SCR Chapter 80-Publication and Citation of Opinions
v. Jones, 214 Wis. 2d 408, 412. Doe v. Roe, 595 N.W.2d 346, 352. (b) Citation to specific
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1180 - 2017-09-19