Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8271 - 8280 of 12879 for se.
Search results 8271 - 8280 of 12879 for se.
[PDF]
Robert Macemon v. Jessica Christie
. Macemon, pro se. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondents-respondents, the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12173 - 2017-09-21
. Macemon, pro se. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondents-respondents, the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12173 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court stated: “I don’t think I found that amount was wrong, per se. I said … that you can take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283859 - 2020-09-03
, the court stated: “I don’t think I found that amount was wrong, per se. I said … that you can take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283859 - 2020-09-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2015AP784-CR. ¶4 Gonzalez, pro se, then filed a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion seeking an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559658 - 2022-08-30
, No. 2015AP784-CR. ¶4 Gonzalez, pro se, then filed a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion seeking an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559658 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Elliott (collectively “Wilson”), pro se, appeal from a judgment of foreclosure on a land contract. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25
Elliott (collectively “Wilson”), pro se, appeal from a judgment of foreclosure on a land contract. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
State v. Bryce C. Nelson
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. ANALYSIS ¶10 Warrantless searches are "per se" unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15752 - 2017-09-21
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. ANALYSIS ¶10 Warrantless searches are "per se" unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15752 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
because they had expired registrations. ¶3 On December 14, Krongard appeared pro se in municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93963 - 2013-03-11
because they had expired registrations. ¶3 On December 14, Krongard appeared pro se in municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93963 - 2013-03-11
[PDF]
Scott Rubadeau v. David H. Schwarz
Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Scott Rubadeau has appealed pro se from a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5082 - 2017-09-19
Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Scott Rubadeau has appealed pro se from a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5082 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Diehl, pro se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32080 - 2008-03-12
Diehl, pro se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32080 - 2008-03-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
PER CURIAM. Earl Diehl, pro se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32080 - 2014-09-15
PER CURIAM. Earl Diehl, pro se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32080 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
MEE Bellevue, LLC v. Winnebago County
such a buffer. We reject any implication that the buffer requirement was per se arbitrary because it may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6764 - 2017-09-20
such a buffer. We reject any implication that the buffer requirement was per se arbitrary because it may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6764 - 2017-09-20