Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8271 - 8280 of 12879 for se.
Search results 8271 - 8280 of 12879 for se.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
action.” We note that Jones had filed a pro se motion seeking a “motion to suppress evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193783 - 2017-09-21
action.” We note that Jones had filed a pro se motion seeking a “motion to suppress evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193783 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Anthony Ellis, pro se, appeals from an order denying a motion for sentence modification, from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41323 - 2009-09-28
CURIAM. Anthony Ellis, pro se, appeals from an order denying a motion for sentence modification, from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41323 - 2009-09-28
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Vincent N. Spruill, Jr.
is not a per se violation giving rise to reasonable suspicion. Inconsequential movement within a lane does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20
is not a per se violation giving rise to reasonable suspicion. Inconsequential movement within a lane does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
se, brought a motion in July 2007, seeking to “initiate Petitioner’s retirement benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59402 - 2014-09-15
se, brought a motion in July 2007, seeking to “initiate Petitioner’s retirement benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59402 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Viola G. Bodach v. Village of Fontana-On-Geneva Lake
. In proceedings before the Board, some of the taxpayers complained pro se of an excessive assessment, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11480 - 2017-09-19
. In proceedings before the Board, some of the taxpayers complained pro se of an excessive assessment, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11480 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Zong Lor
and Schudson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Zong Lor, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6223 - 2017-09-19
and Schudson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Zong Lor, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6223 - 2017-09-19
City of Milwaukee v. B. Davis Investment, LLC
. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J.[1] Brian E. Davis, pro se, on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5174 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J.[1] Brian E. Davis, pro se, on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5174 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
procedure specified under [Wis. Stat.] ch. 799.” We also note that Weber, acting pro se, submitted a letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35552 - 2009-02-17
procedure specified under [Wis. Stat.] ch. 799.” We also note that Weber, acting pro se, submitted a letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35552 - 2009-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se motions seeking additional sentence credit in the present case from the date of his arrest were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416866 - 2021-09-01
se motions seeking additional sentence credit in the present case from the date of his arrest were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416866 - 2021-09-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
bond. The court made the following findings: (1) Young filed pro se motions while represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252124 - 2020-01-16
bond. The court made the following findings: (1) Young filed pro se motions while represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252124 - 2020-01-16

