Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8281 - 8290 of 68564 for j o e y.

COURT OF APPEALS
explained that “[y]ou wouldn’t necessarily expect to see any type of physical damage, based on the type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32006 - 2008-03-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Court Ozaukee County Courthouse Electronic Notice Adam Y. Gerol Electronic Notice Mark S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531414 - 2022-06-15

[PDF] Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
that Praxmarer told him “[y]ou need to do what we have to do.” Praxmarer, conversely, testified that Loehrke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25624 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
is not “reasonabl[y] related to the seriousness of the alleged offense” in light of his prior service record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57413 - 2010-12-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to evaluate information and make decisions.” Dr. Hurlbut further testified, “[M]y memory is that she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149745 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
prior sentences ranging from probation to federal prison. The court explained: “[M]y point in going
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832965 - 2024-08-01

[PDF] WI 3
provides that Attorney Omdahl is subject to reciprocal discipline under SCR 22.225 "[b]y virtue of having
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46135 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the sentencing court told Graham at sentencing: “[Y]ou cannot be supervised in the community
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299264 - 2020-10-27

State v. Joseph H. Gray
back from close range. On the day of the shooting, Gray wrote the victim a letter stating in part, “[Y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21482 - 2006-02-21

[PDF] NOTICE
” apply the standards found WIS. STAT. § 62.50(17)(b)6 & 7 and that discharge is not “reasonabl[y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57413 - 2014-09-15