Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 831 - 840 of 6293 for 208.

[PDF] State v. Colleen B. Dunn
, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 190, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). ¶5 Dunn cites to the holding in Nelson v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15536 - 2017-09-21

Village of Bonduel v. Eldorado's Adult Party Store
182, 199, 208 N.W.2d 121, 130 (1973). This court agrees with the trial court that the ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12082 - 2005-03-31

Margricio Benitez v. William Fasick
these issues de novo. First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13362 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Civil disposition summary: State
50 208 Foreclosure of Mortgage 8111 9063 0 14 305 5363 3296 85 114 Other Real Estate 629 612 6 34 103
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispostate17.pdf - 2018-02-09

[PDF] Civil disposition summary: State
293 456 87 165 Other Debtor Actions 208 214 0 1 18 85 78 32 101 Condemnation Review 91 89 2 0 33 6 32
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/civildispostate15.pdf - 2016-02-25

[PDF] Village of Shorewood Hills v. Kenneth R. McGrew
a constitutional right to a jury trial. We are bound by Waldofsky. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189-90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3450 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Lorenza D. Thompson v. Lennore Biggers Thompson
this finding (Lennore's testimony and Lorenza's letter). Law Lorenza claims that Brown v. State, 208 Ga
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7874 - 2017-09-19

State v. Allan R. Washachek
with no criminal convictions. See State v. Miller, 175 Wis. 2d 204, 208, 499 N.W.2d 215 (Ct. App. 1993). Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2526 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Eduardo Perez
208, 210 (Ct. App. 1991). Construing the statute’s plain language, we are required to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9778 - 2017-09-19

State v. Eduardo Perez
which we review de novo. See State v. Rohl, 160 Wis.2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208, 210 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9778 - 2005-03-31