Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 831 - 840 of 17414 for Cost.
Search results 831 - 840 of 17414 for Cost.
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leo Barron Hicks
that Attorney Hicks be required to pay the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 We determine that a public reprimand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16662 - 2017-09-21
that Attorney Hicks be required to pay the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 We determine that a public reprimand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16662 - 2017-09-21
Sanfelippo Environmental Construction, LLC v. Mews Companies, Inc.
granting Sanfelippo Environmental Construction, LLC, $1,162.23 in damages and $23,261.20 in costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14586 - 2005-03-31
granting Sanfelippo Environmental Construction, LLC, $1,162.23 in damages and $23,261.20 in costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14586 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the Ordings’ attorney fees of $41,000 and costs for its expert witness of $4,126. Everdry argues the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2015-04-13
the Ordings’ attorney fees of $41,000 and costs for its expert witness of $4,126. Everdry argues the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2015-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
property, including the cost of removing its debris.” (“Ordinance or Law Exclusion”). The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944855 - 2025-04-22
property, including the cost of removing its debris.” (“Ordinance or Law Exclusion”). The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944855 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Everdry to pay the Ordings’ attorney fees of $41,000 and costs for its expert witness of $4,126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139580 - 2017-09-21
Everdry to pay the Ordings’ attorney fees of $41,000 and costs for its expert witness of $4,126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139580 - 2017-09-21
Kevin A. Laufer v. Town of Merton
their house, at a cost of over $300,000, but instead would have sold the property. The Laufers brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31
their house, at a cost of over $300,000, but instead would have sold the property. The Laufers brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kevin A. Laufer v. Town of Merton
of the conditional use permit, they would not have built their house, at a cost of over $300,000, but instead would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14080 - 2014-09-15
of the conditional use permit, they would not have built their house, at a cost of over $300,000, but instead would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14080 - 2014-09-15
Eric G. Hanson v. Town of Richland Board of Review
reverse that part of the judgment imposing costs against the Town and remand the matter for a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25179 - 2006-05-15
reverse that part of the judgment imposing costs against the Town and remand the matter for a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25179 - 2006-05-15
[PDF]
Eric G. Hanson v. Town of Richland Board of Review
of the judgment imposing costs against the Town and remand the matter for a hearing on costs. ¶2 The assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25179 - 2017-09-21
of the judgment imposing costs against the Town and remand the matter for a hearing on costs. ¶2 The assessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25179 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 18
and cause remanded with directions; costs awarded. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44818 - 2010-01-26
and cause remanded with directions; costs awarded. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44818 - 2010-01-26