Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 831 - 840 of 60045 for quit claim deed/1000.

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
Mental commitments Self representation Probate Small claims Other languages Court of Appeals Office
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=153&year=2009

[PDF] Form Summary
that portion of the Judgment affecting the title to real estate with the Register of Deeds in the county
/formdisplay/FA-4135_summary.pdf?formNumber=FA-4135&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-04-21

[PDF] NOTICE
, and dismissed the Herrmanns’ remaining claims for failure to file supporting affidavits. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33861 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
’ uninterrupted adverse possession, and dismissed the Herrmanns’ remaining claims for failure to file supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33861 - 2008-09-02

State v. David A. Kelly
Kelly with causing more than $1000 damage to property, a Class D felony. See § 943.01(1) and (2)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7764 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that the plain language of the deed conveying the easement imposes a condition precedent that the Paulsens must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2009-11-04

[PDF] NOTICE
of the deed conveying the easement imposes a condition precedent that the Paulsens must meet to enjoy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43131 - 2014-09-15

City of Milwaukee v. Allos, Inc.
was mailed to the then-owner, Oscar Shannon. On June 29, 1995, Allos received a deed in lieu of foreclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13285 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Milwaukee v. Allos, Inc.
of the order was mailed to the then-owner, Oscar Shannon. On June 29, 1995, Allos received a deed in lieu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13285 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
that the “evidence” Laughrin claims is newly-discovered—Dr. Junig’s July 13, 2010 Suboxone report—is not new evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83527 - 2012-06-11