Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 831 - 840 of 65036 for timed.

Frederick Bowers v. David H. Schwarz
CURIAM. Frederick Bowers appeals from an order that affirms a forfeiture of good time imposed during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3094 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Response to Letter Briefs (WILL)
on a premise contrary to binding Supreme Court case law, namely that this Court must provide time for federal
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefswill.pdf - 2021-10-18

State v. Melvin W. Range, Inc.
the parties learned that the judgment had been entered, the appeal time had run. They stipulated to vacating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10162 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Melvin W. Range, Inc.
, the appeal time had run. They stipulated to vacating and re-entering the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10162 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
were not timely served. In response to the motion to dismiss, Henderson had argued that service
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95873 - 2013-04-21

[PDF] Richard J. Callaway v. Teamsters Union Local 695
transferred at his own request from a full-time position to a part-time position. About five months later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8377 - 2017-09-19

Richard J. Callaway v. Teamsters Union Local 695
at his own request from a full-time position to a part-time position. About five months later, Callaway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8377 - 2005-03-31

Julie A. Kenyon v. Ralph C. Kenyon
proceeding, the appropriate comparison is to the set of facts that existed at the time of the most recent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16691 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Julie A. Kenyon v. Ralph C. Kenyon
of facts that existed at the time of the most recent maintenance order, whether that is the original
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16691 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
] The circuit court entered a default judgment against Arch after it failed to timely answer the Hollidays
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33899 - 2008-10-27