Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8301 - 8310 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8301 - 8310 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” and a “taking.” Id., ¶¶12-14. On de novo review of a court commissioner’s decision dismissing the small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965302 - 2025-06-03
,” and a “taking.” Id., ¶¶12-14. On de novo review of a court commissioner’s decision dismissing the small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965302 - 2025-06-03
State v. Kieuta Z. Perry
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6188 - 2005-03-31
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6188 - 2005-03-31
Michael S.E. v. Shawn B.S.
that Michael had not incurred any allowable costs. At best, Michael could only have recovered postage, a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5041 - 2005-03-31
that Michael had not incurred any allowable costs. At best, Michael could only have recovered postage, a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5041 - 2005-03-31
Davy Engineering Co. v. Clerk of Town of Mentor
. This presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13363 - 2005-03-31
. This presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13363 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rosemary K. Oliveira v. City of Milwaukee
that this makes the rezoning void. This presents a legal issue subject to our de novo review. See Gloudeman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14430 - 2017-09-21
that this makes the rezoning void. This presents a legal issue subject to our de novo review. See Gloudeman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14430 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law de novo. Id. ¶11 We likewise review de novo the circuit court’s entry of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253404 - 2020-02-06
of law de novo. Id. ¶11 We likewise review de novo the circuit court’s entry of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253404 - 2020-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Robert and Mary urge this court to engage in a de novo standard of review to the court’s July 2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676618 - 2023-07-06
, Robert and Mary urge this court to engage in a de novo standard of review to the court’s July 2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676618 - 2023-07-06
[PDF]
WI APP 32
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137950 - 2017-09-21
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137950 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
it was owed. II. ¶16 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29708 - 2007-07-16
it was owed. II. ¶16 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29708 - 2007-07-16
Josephine Artac v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
are questions of law that we review de novo. See Tannler v. DHSS, 211 Wis. 2d 179, 183, 564 N.W.2d 735 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15626 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law that we review de novo. See Tannler v. DHSS, 211 Wis. 2d 179, 183, 564 N.W.2d 735 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15626 - 2005-03-31