Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8301 - 8310 of 64286 for records/1000.

[PDF] FORM SUMMARY
Information from Court Record Form Number GF-183B Approval date: 09/12/2024 Page 1 of 1 Release date: 04
/formdisplay/GF-183Bs_summary.pdf?formNumber=GF-183Bs&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-04-01

[PDF] FORM SUMMARY
the Court Record Because of Identity Theft or Mistaken Identity Form Number GF-182A Approval date: 09
/formdisplay/GF-182A_summary.pdf?formNumber=GF-182A&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-04-01

Clarence C. Joseph v. Gary R. McCaughtry
recommendation, the social worker’s recommendation, Joseph’s institutional record of conduct reports and program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12273 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
It is not clear from the record why almost six months elapsed between the filing of the motion and the entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2295 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the Record fails to demonstrate that N.D. waived his right to counsel, this court reverses the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651725 - 2023-05-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and we have independently reviewed the record. We conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172523 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not raise sufficient facts to warrant relief, if the allegations are merely conclusory, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87402 - 2014-09-15

State v. James F. Karls
the private attorney for financial reasons and would be proceeding pro se. There is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas M. Stockland
that were on the calendar on that date, and the particular discussions that were had on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5541 - 2005-03-31

Michael T. Mulqueen v. Barbara Geller
: (a) the oral stipulation placed on the record pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 807.05 (1999-2000) was not valid;[3] (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3812 - 2005-03-31