Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8301 - 8310 of 19940 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
Search results 8301 - 8310 of 19940 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
COURT OF APPEALS
, 460 U.S. 491, 501 (1983). Welch contends that he was being illegally detained and searched when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70219 - 2011-08-24
, 460 U.S. 491, 501 (1983). Welch contends that he was being illegally detained and searched when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70219 - 2011-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Borowski, 116 Wis. 2d 683, 686, 342 N.W.2d 759 (Ct. App. 1983). “If the statutory prescriptions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815670 - 2024-06-25
. Borowski, 116 Wis. 2d 683, 686, 342 N.W.2d 759 (Ct. App. 1983). “If the statutory prescriptions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815670 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
David C. Zugenbuehler v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
344, 346 (Ct. App. 1983). The reviewing court must search the record to locate credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8581 - 2017-09-19
344, 346 (Ct. App. 1983). The reviewing court must search the record to locate credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8581 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey G. Steffensen
. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 233-34 (1983). This is because when an informant is known, the informant can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2696 - 2017-09-19
. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 233-34 (1983). This is because when an informant is known, the informant can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2696 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard L. Bignell
334, 342, 340 N.W.2d 498 (1983). Furthermore, Bignell’s challenge concerns the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2407 - 2005-03-31
334, 342, 340 N.W.2d 498 (1983). Furthermore, Bignell’s challenge concerns the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2407 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mistye L. Doughty
. Berg, 116 Wis. 2d 360, 365-66, 342 N.W.2d 258 (Ct. App. 1983). Matthew’s testimony was inconsistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6443 - 2005-03-31
. Berg, 116 Wis. 2d 360, 365-66, 342 N.W.2d 258 (Ct. App. 1983). Matthew’s testimony was inconsistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6443 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis Gutknecht
, 344 N.W.2d 194 (Ct. App. 1983). Proper sentencing discretion is demonstrated if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3890 - 2005-03-31
, 344 N.W.2d 194 (Ct. App. 1983). Proper sentencing discretion is demonstrated if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3890 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas R. Kinnaman
(Ct. App. 1983). By the Court.—Order affirmed. Not recommended for publication in the official
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10903 - 2017-09-20
(Ct. App. 1983). By the Court.—Order affirmed. Not recommended for publication in the official
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10903 - 2017-09-20
State v. Douglas E. Vest, Jr.
.2d 616, 626 (1983). The trial court properly excludes a violating witness if the party calling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12511 - 2005-03-31
.2d 616, 626 (1983). The trial court properly excludes a violating witness if the party calling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12511 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael W. Fink
to present a relevant, promising defense. See Smith v. Estelle, 711 F.2d 677, 682 (5th Cir. 1983), cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9372 - 2005-03-31
to present a relevant, promising defense. See Smith v. Estelle, 711 F.2d 677, 682 (5th Cir. 1983), cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9372 - 2005-03-31