Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8311 - 8320 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8311 - 8320 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
State v. Kieuta Z. Perry
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6188 - 2005-03-31
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant present questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6188 - 2005-03-31
Michael S.E. v. Shawn B.S.
that Michael had not incurred any allowable costs. At best, Michael could only have recovered postage, a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5041 - 2005-03-31
that Michael had not incurred any allowable costs. At best, Michael could only have recovered postage, a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5041 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Luther Wade Cofield
, 18 (1999)). This presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Harris, 199 Wis. 2d 227
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5877 - 2017-09-19
, 18 (1999)). This presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Harris, 199 Wis. 2d 227
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5877 - 2017-09-19
Davy Engineering Co. v. Clerk of Town of Mentor
. This presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13363 - 2005-03-31
. This presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13363 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rosemary K. Oliveira v. City of Milwaukee
that this makes the rezoning void. This presents a legal issue subject to our de novo review. See Gloudeman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14430 - 2017-09-21
that this makes the rezoning void. This presents a legal issue subject to our de novo review. See Gloudeman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14430 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law de novo. Id. ¶11 We likewise review de novo the circuit court’s entry of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253404 - 2020-02-06
of law de novo. Id. ¶11 We likewise review de novo the circuit court’s entry of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253404 - 2020-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Robert and Mary urge this court to engage in a de novo standard of review to the court’s July 2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676618 - 2023-07-06
, Robert and Mary urge this court to engage in a de novo standard of review to the court’s July 2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676618 - 2023-07-06
[PDF]
WI APP 32
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137950 - 2017-09-21
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137950 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of LaGrange v. Walworth County Board of Adjustment
). Our review of a summary judgment ruling is de novo. Id. In addition, this case presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7132 - 2017-09-20
). Our review of a summary judgment ruling is de novo. Id. In addition, this case presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7132 - 2017-09-20
Charles A. Kramer v. Board of Education of the School District of the Menomonie Area
review de novo. See Handicapped Children’s Educ. Bd. v. Lukaszewski, 112 Wis. 2d 197, 206-07, 332 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3431 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Handicapped Children’s Educ. Bd. v. Lukaszewski, 112 Wis. 2d 197, 206-07, 332 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3431 - 2005-03-31