Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8311 - 8320 of 74519 for public records.

COURT OF APPEALS
that would not diminish the seriousness of the offenses and to protect the public. There exists a record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30295 - 2007-09-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
within one of five exceptions: (1) the issue is of great public importance; (2) the issue involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284520 - 2020-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
the seriousness of the offenses and to protect the public. There exists a record explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30295 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 62
and the public informed about the progress of the pilot project in the supreme court, including any changes
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378648 - 2021-06-15

[PDF] WI APP 64
extensive prior juvenile record, his problems with alcohol abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35690 - 2014-09-15

2009 WI APP 64
, his extensive prior juvenile record, his problems with alcohol abuse and his recent interest in Native
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35690 - 2009-05-26

[PDF] State v. Confucius Gooden
believe that given the lack of substantial prior record, and the facts of this case, that five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
remorse, and the rights of the public.” Id. We will affirm a sentence “if [the] facts of record show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30467 - 2007-10-01

State v. Confucius Gooden
of substantial prior record, and the facts of this case, that five years is an appropriate, ah, sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11869 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
to file a response but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12